We love the success story: Project failing, changed methodology (usually Agile), instant turnaround. But is switching frameworks truly the cure for poor delivery? This expert argues that your current methodology is probably *not* the problem. Learn why implementation, not the method itself, is the true root cause of project failure—and the three audit steps to fix it.
I very often see posts describing #successstories of implementing completely new #projectmanagement methodologies that resulted in spectacular success. The pattern is usually the same: the project was dragging on, going over budget, failing to deliver value, and then after the change (usually to some form of agile, though maybe it's just a coincidence that I mostly see these posts) suddenly everything turned around.
But is restructuring based on "scrapping" everything that came before and starting over in a different way a method that guarantees #success?
In my opinion, not necessarily. Of course, there are situations where the management method was chosen poorly from the start, but that is usually visible right away. If we only realize this after a long time, we were either monitoring efficiency poorly, or...
Exactly—the method itself is not the problem! 🤨
The problem is how it is implemented or used.
If I have a hammer and I’m trying to drive a nail using the handle, does that mean picking up a screwdriver will improve my situation?
Before you decide the project "isn't working" and you need to change the methodology, first check if the methodology itself is actually the problem:
Sometimes repair doesn't necessarily mean replacing all the parts, or even the equipment itself—it’s enough to diagnose the source and apply a targeted fix...
Strategic Technology, Delivery & Transformation Architect
Seasoned technology executive and transformation leader dedicated to bridging the gap between high-level business strategy and complex engineering execution. Specialized in stabilizing volatile IT environments, scaling agile delivery across international borders, and mentoring the next generation of technology leaders. Whether acting as a Fractional CTO or an Interim Program Director, establishes the operational discipline and strategic oversight needed to drive predictable, high-value outcomes in the most demanding industries.